Cheap term life. Professional Provident Society Insurance Company Ltd v The PPS Life and Disability Insurance Scheme (115,LM,Dec12) 2013 ZACT 23 (8 April 2013)

You are here: SAFLII >> Databases >> South Africa: Competition Tribunal >> 2013 >> [2013] ZACT 23

Professional Provident Society Insurance Company Ltd v The PPS Life and Disability Insurance Scheme (115/LM/Dec12) [2013] ZACT 23 (8 April 2013)


Professional Provident Society

Panel: Takalani Madima (Presiding Member)

Anton Roskam (Tribunal Member)

Andiswa Ndoni (Tribunal Member)

Order issued on: 20 March 2013

Reasons issued on: 08 April 2013

On 20 March 2013 the Competition Tribunal (“Tribunal”) approved the merger between Professional Provident Society Insurance Company Limited (“PPS Insurance”), and The PPS and Life Disability Insurance Scheme (“The reasons for approving the proposed transaction follow below.

Level benefit term life

Parties to the transaction

The primary acquiring firm is PPS Insurance which is a long term insurance company registered in terms of the Long Term Insurance Act.

PPS Insurance operates as a mutual insurer which provides life, illness and other benefits such as pension and medical scheme benefits to policyholders by way of various types of long-term insurance policies.

The primary target firm is The Scheme, which is jointly controlled by PPS Insurance and Sanlam Life Insurance Company Limited (“Sanlam”). The Scheme provides long term insurance policies in the form of life and disability risk cover and operates as a closed scheme.

The proposed transaction involves the substitution of liability between PPS Insurance and Sanlam in terms of which Sanlam’s liability to policyholders in respect of The Scheme would be substituted with the liability of PPS Insurance towards policyholders.

The relevant market and the impact on competition

The relevant product market is the market for the provision of long term insurance policies. Registered long term insurers offer individual and/or group policies and the market can further be delineated into narrower markets depending on the type of risk cover as set out in the Long Term Insurance Act.

Term life insurance for couples

There is a horizontal overlap in the activities of the merging parties as they both active in the provision of long term insurance market, offering long term individual insurance policies.

The Commission and merging parties submitted the market for long term insurance to be national as insurance policies are sold throughout the country and prices are not differentiated by regions.

During the hearing, the merging parties submitted that barriers to entry in the market are not prohibitive and are similar to those of short term insurance. The minimum capital requirements in terms of solvency requirements of a long term insurer is set by the Financial Services Board (“FSB”) to be R10 million. There have been seven entrants in the market, from 2008-2010.

Post merger, the merged entity will have a market share of less than 2%. It is evident from this, that the merging entities post merger, will face sufficient competition from other competitors in the market.

The Merging parties submitted that the proposed transaction will not result in any job losses. Furthermore, the proposed merger raises no clear public interest concerns.

We conclude that that the proposed transaction is unlikely to substantially lessen or prevent competition in any relevant market.

We unconditionally approve the merger.

Best online life insurance

Anton Roskam and Mondo Mazwai concurring.

Tribunal Researcher: Caroline Sserufusa

For the merging parties: Paul Cleland of Werksmans Attorneys

For the Commission: Zanele Hadebe
Overall rating page: 4.1 / 5 left 1058 people.

Posted by at 12:58AM

Tags: cheap term life, reassure america life insurance, product liability insurance, life insurance term life insurance, instant insurance life quote term, most reasonable life insurance, whole life insurance coverage, level benefit term life, best online life insurance, term life insurance for couples


There are no comments for this post "Professional Provident Society Insurance Company Ltd v The PPS Life and Disability Insurance Scheme (115,LM,Dec12) 2013 ZACT 23 (8 April 2013)". Be the first to comment...

Add Comment